Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/2007-08/Formatting of mentioned terms, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Straw-polling on: how to format mentioned terms in English or an English-like alphabet. (Note that this is not about transliterations, and does not apply to terms in languages like Russian, Hebrew, or Chinese; those have their own considerations.)
Straw-poll ends: 5 September 2007 23:59 UTC
Straw-poll started: 27 August 2007 23:59 UTC
- Straw-poll created: —RuakhTALK 21:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion:
WT:BP#Consistent_format_for_mentioned_terms
This section is included only for completeness; this has been resolved by Wiktionary:Votes/2006-12/form-of style. The conclusion was to use bold by default (but this is overrideable by user CSS).
Elsewhere in definition lines
Please enter * bold ~~~~
, * italics ~~~~
, * “quotation marks” ~~~~
, * plain ~~~~
, or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms in definition lines (aside from mentioned terms in "form of" templates) should be formatted.
In usage notes
Please enter * bold ~~~~
, * italics ~~~~
, * “quotation marks” ~~~~
, * plain ~~~~
, or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms in usage notes should be formatted.
In etymologies
Please enter * bold ~~~~
, * italics ~~~~
, * “quotation marks” ~~~~
, * plain ~~~~
, or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms in etymologies should be formatted.
In "* terms", "*onyms", and similar sections
Please enter * bold ~~~~
, * italics ~~~~
, * “quotation marks” ~~~~
, * plain ~~~~
, or the like on the next blank line to indicate your preference for how mentioned terms should be formatted in "Related terms", "Derived terms", "Synonyms", "Antonyms", "Descendants", etc.
Conclusion