Wiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/2008-10/es-verb Template, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

es-verb Template

  • Voting on: Substitution of {{es-verb}} in place of the exisitng {{es-verb-ar}}, {{es-verb-er}}, and {{es-verb-ir}}, so that we use a single template consistently for all Spanish verb lemmata. A full description of the template's function with examples appears on the template's talk page.
  • Vote ends: 4 November 2008 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 7 October 2008 23:59 UTC

Support

  1. Support EncycloPetey 00:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  2. Support Nadando 00:50, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  3. SupportRuakhTALK 02:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  4. Support Matthias Buchmeier 08:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  5. Support Neskaya kanetsv 16:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  6. Support — if for no other reason, then because everyone commenting at Wiktionary talk:About Spanish agreed to it, and a change like this doesn't really require a vote AFAICT.—msh210 20:03, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
    I'm not sure that it requires a vote either, but it is a major change to one of the best-represented languages on Wiktionary, replacing three venerable and heavily-used templates. I'd rather not make such a major change on the basis of just four opinions. Besides, even if everyone agrees to it, the time spent in voting will allow the community to be informed and to plan accordingly. --EncycloPetey 23:37, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
  7. Support Bequw¢τ 07:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
  8. Support Robert Ullmann 12:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC) (don't think it requires a vote, but okay)
  9. Support --Barmar 12:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
  10. Support H. (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2008 (UTC) I also don’t think a vote is needed for something like this.

Oppose

Abstain

Decision

  • Approved (10-0-0)