Wiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/2009-09/renaming enPR to AHD, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
renaming enPR → AHD
- Voting on: restoring the "enPR" transcription key to its original designation of "AHD", referring to the American Heritage Dictionary. This would affect the wording and location of
{{enPR}}, as well as the wording of the headings of the Wiktionary:English pronunciation key. - Vote starts: 00:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Vote created: kwami 21:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Discussion:
Support
Support kwami 21:54, 26 September 2009 (UTC): Using the initials "AHD" to giving credit to the AHD is not copyright violation. Failing to give credit is plagiarism.
Oppose
Oppose EncycloPetey 22:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC) Credit can be given without altering the name. "AHD" stands for "American Heritage Dictionary", not their respelling system. --EncycloPetey 22:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)- Oppose Robert Ullmann 22:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC) strongly. And voting is not a dispute resolution process. Given the proponent's personal abuse of EP on the 'pedia, I would suggest that "kwami" be blocked here. He/she has made no attempt to apologise. This "vote" should be terminated. Robert Ullmann 22:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- It was EP who instructed me to bring it to a vote! It is also EP who has abused his admin privileges, as several other good editors have complained. Personally I think EP should be blocked for his block-happy behaviour, but that is utterly irrelevant for this vote. kwami 23:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)