Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2 you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/2010-04/Renaming requested entry pages 2, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Renaming requested entry pages 2
- Voting on: Confirming the option of Wiktionary:Votes/2010-03/Renaming requested entry pages that has won the majority support. That is, renaming Wiktionary:Requested entries:Spanish to Wiktionary:Requested entries (Spanish), and renaming pages for other languages on the model of this.
- Vote starts: 00:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC) - 14 days after the start
- Vote created: Dan Polansky 16:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
- Discussion:
Support
Support Thryduulf 11:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC). I'm not certain that this vote is necessary, but voting in support in case it is. Thryduulf 11:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)- Support Dan Polansky 14:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC). I don't particularly care either way. I agree with this renaming for its consistency with the names of language-specific categories in Wiktionary: Category:Requests (Spanish), Category:Translation requests (Spanish), Category:Requests for etymology (Spanish), Category:Requests for audio pronunciation (Spanish), Category:Requests for pronunciation (Spanish), and Category:Tbot entries (Spanish). --Dan Polansky 14:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 00:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC) Although, I agree with msh210 that the vote passed (as I understood it). --EncycloPetey 00:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support also agree other vote passed, but we might as well document that consensus here by voting in support. --Bequw → τ 02:56, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Yair rand 17:20, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Robert Ullmann 09:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC) although not really necessary as mentioned by others Robert Ullmann 09:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support AugPi 15:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support (and by the way it's my favorite option too) DAVilla 08:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
- Belated support. But not only was this vote unnecessary — the previous vote was unnecessary as well! —RuakhTALK 19:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Per discussion at the bottom of the preceding vote, and on this vote's talkpage, we should not be voting on this. The vote passed, and that's all: there's no need for a second vote.—msh210℠ 17:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
