Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified Tagalog, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Unified Tagalog
- Voting on: unifying Category:Tagalog language and Category:Filipino language into a single Category:Tagalog language. This would involve the emptying and eventual deletion (or use of
{{movecat}}) of all of the subcategories of Category:Filipino language including topical categories that start with Category:fil.{{fil}}would either be deleted (when unused) or moved to{{etyl:fil}}. This would be decided by a discussion on Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others
- Vote starts: 00:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23.59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Vote created: Mglovesfun (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Discussion:
Support
Support sure, why not -- Liliana • 14:21, 8 October 2011 (UTC)- Support --Vahag 08:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support --JorisvS 14:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support. If there are places where it is necessary to distinguish, we have context tags and usage notes. - -sche (discuss) 19:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support. If Filipino/Pilipino becomes a more common term, we can always change it. As of now, Tagalog is the most common term used in the Philippines and abroad. --Anatoli 00:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Matthias Buchmeier 08:45, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support Maro 19:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support (For the reasons I gave in WT:BP#Filipino and Tagalog) -- Gronky 18:42, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Seems very reasonable with little grounds for objection. DAVilla 06:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Ruakh deleted my vote (the comment read something like "This vote is a genocide" with a bunch of exclamation marks) — — 12:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- He did, and in my opinion he shouldn't have. The comment wasn't so inappropriate that it couldn't have stayed. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- He shouldn't have whether it was inappropriate or not. If it had been something wildly, completely unacceptable maybe, but otherwise he could have asked me to change it. Or, removed the comment and left the vote. But really, I know we all do shit we shouldn't so I'm not going to put an unfair double standard on him. — — 12:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought you were just making an offensive joke at the expense of the B/C/S splittists. I didn't realize that you genuinely meant your "oppose" vote. Mea culpa. —RuakhTALK 13:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Truth told, I'm not concerned about the outcome of this vote, but it looks like it's going to pass anyway, and I feel like every vote needs at least one twat to oppose it for no reason whatsoever. Today, I shall be that twat. Oh but yes, the comment was meant to disparage those... people. — — 15:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought you were just making an offensive joke at the expense of the B/C/S splittists. I didn't realize that you genuinely meant your "oppose" vote. Mea culpa. —RuakhTALK 13:49, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- He shouldn't have whether it was inappropriate or not. If it had been something wildly, completely unacceptable maybe, but otherwise he could have asked me to change it. Or, removed the comment and left the vote. But really, I know we all do shit we shouldn't so I'm not going to put an unfair double standard on him. — — 12:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- He did, and in my opinion he shouldn't have. The comment wasn't so inappropriate that it couldn't have stayed. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain Ƿidsiþ 07:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)- Abstain, won't affect me, but I'll unify 'em by bot if no other bot users want to do it. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain Dan Polansky 08:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC), only because I do not want to look into the issue; I am inclined to support. --Dan Polansky 08:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Decision
- Passes, 9-1-3. --Yair rand 17:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)