Wiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/2016-12/Division of Church Slavonic languages, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Division of Church Slavonic languages

Voting on: Separation of Old Church Slavonic and Russian Church Slavonic.

Rationale: English Wiktionary recognizes only one Church Slavonic language — Old Church Slavonic (OCS), but it’s incorrect because there exists a lot of CS languages, and all of them are extremely different. They have different letters, different paradigms, different vocabulary. OCS disintegrated in about XI century.

Schedule:

Discussions:

Support

  1. Support Γρηγόριος (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose until I hear further. Not discussed and editors who have worked on OCS have not shown interest in splitting these in the past. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 08:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
  2. Oppose the vote itself. This issue needs to be discussed first. --WikiTiki89 17:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
  3. Oppose for now; it needs more discussion first. Certainly RCS is different from OCS, but I don't know whether it's different enough to warrant being a separate language as opposed to a regional/temporal dialect; in other words, that tagging Russianisms with {{lb|cu|Russia}} or the like isn't sufficient. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 08:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

  1. Abstain I'm pretty sure we can use WT:RFM to suggest splitting languages. I feel RFM implies discussing and possibly changing a proposal based on other's ideas, while votes are to implement something "set on stone" and already revised/discussed. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 12:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
  2. Abstain I know nothing about Church Slavonic languages, and I don't recall there being a discussion about this prior to the vote. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 17:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
  3. Abstain -Xbony2 (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Decision