Voting on: The creation of the following new templates, {{|inherited+}} ({{inh+}}) and {{|borrowed+}} ({{bor+}}), which would generate the full etymological...
Voting on: Nullifying Wiktionary:Votes/2021-04/Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+, and holding that the two templates in question did not require...
Votes/2021-03/Polarity of voting proposals and application of supermajority rule Votes/2021-04/Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+ Votes/2021-06/Disallowing...
2021 (UTC) Despite the failed vote, Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+, @SodhakSH (and Brutal Russian) went ahead and created the templates {{bor+}}...
templates did not require a vote in the first place. Thus, I would like to start a vote to nullify Wiktionary:Votes/2021-04/Creation_of_Template:inh+_and_Template:bor+...
April 2021 (UTC) I struck my votes... first, please make it clear what would happen, not that the proposal keeps changing. Making {{inh+}} and {{bor+}} seems...
Then the {{bor}} and {{inh}} templates can be updated accordingly, and {{bor+}} and {{inh+}} deleted. — SGconlaw (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC) @Sgconlaw:...
({{inh+}} & {{bor+}}). Svartava2 (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC) I agree with Μετα that WP:ArbCom is not as functional as one might wish, and with...
March 2021 (UTC) @Eirikr, Lambiam: Hey, we now finally have a vote to this end: Wiktionary:Votes/2021-04/Creation of Template:inh+ and Template:bor+. Please...
you make a vote for its inclusion, but until then, please use |bor= and |lbor= where appropriate. --{{victar|talk}} 21:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC) @Brutal...