Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bc-2012-06/User:Ruakh for bureaucrat, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Ruakh for bureaucrat

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Ruakh as a local English Wiktionary Bureaucrat. I'm sure I don't need to explain why he's a good choice, and I do believe that we need another 'crat to keep things moving. As an example, WarrdrBOT did not get the bot flag until around 20 days after the vote passed, and only because the bot was flooding the recent changes, approved but without a flag. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:33, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  • I co-nominate Ruakh for bureaucrat because more are needed. Of the bureaucrats that we have, only three are active enough to do the job, which for a project this big, is not enough. Therefore, if Ruakh is willing, I think he would be the perfect join for bureaucrat! Thanks, Razorflame 06:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59 21 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 00:00 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  2. Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 12:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC) Is there a reason the vote doesn't start for a couple of days? Whatever. I've never been very good at following policies. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 12:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  3. Support —Stephen (Talk) 15:16, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  4. Support Why not? :) 50 Xylophone Players talk 16:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  5. Support SemperBlotto (talk) 16:57, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  6. Support Silent Sam (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  7. Support Razorflame 18:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC) - As Co-nominator.
  8. Support.​—msh210℠ (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  9. Support. Ruakh is trustworthy. Equinox ◑ 22:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
  10. Support —AugPi 02:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
  11. Support - -sche (discuss) 04:50, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
  12. Support. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 23:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
  13. Support. But you should learn to handle my politically incorrect jokes better. --Vahag (talk) 00:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
  14. Support definitely. DAVilla 14:43, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
  15. Support Dan Polansky (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
  16. Support Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 01:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
  18. Support Neskaya … gawonisgv? 06:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Definitely, Ruakh is a great choice for this and I'm glad that he's accepted the nomination. I think that having another 'crat around will be a good thing for the wikt. --Neskaya … gawonisgv? 06:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

  1. Abstain Liliana • 17:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC) While we've had a lot of disagreements in the past, I as an involved party don't feel well about voting either way. -- Liliana • 17:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia