Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2017-05/User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2017-05/User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2017-05/User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2017-05/User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2017-05/User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/bc-2017-05/User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Paul G for de-bureaucratisation
Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Paul G to be removed as local English Wiktionary Bureaucrat. Not been around since 2015.
Schedule:
Support
- Support, but I agree with Dave below. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- I have created Wiktionary:Votes/2017-05/Removing bureaucrat and checkuser rights for inactivity. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support 2WR1 (talk) 17:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support -Xbony2 (talk) 00:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Victar (talk) 06:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose: We should create a policy akin to the sysop policy for 'crats and checkusers. - DaveRoss 23:05, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose: Since we have Wiktionary:Votes/2017-05/Removing bureaucrat and checkuser rights for inactivity running and since we successfully passed a de-admin policy, let us do these things via policy. --Dan Polansky (talk) 06:12, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per Dan Polansky. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose — Z. b"A. — 05:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Abstain
Decision
No consensus (50-50). --Daniel Carrero (talk) 10:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)