Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2006-03/Request for bot status: SuperlBot. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2006-03/Request for bot status: SuperlBot, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2006-03/Request for bot status: SuperlBot in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2006-03/Request for bot status: SuperlBot you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2006-03/Request for bot status: SuperlBot will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2006-03/Request for bot status: SuperlBot, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Discussion moved from Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2006/March#Request for bot status: SuperlBot.
- Bot: User: SuperlBot
- Owner/operator: User: Connel MacKenzie
- Purpose: Fill in superlatives, exactly as is currently done manually.
- Generation restrictions:
- Entry must not already exist.
- Root form must link the superlative one or two lines after the ===Adjective=== heading.
- Inflection can be provided by regular text wikification, or any other template that wikifies terms.
- All but the last
three two characters of the root form must match the plural form to be auto-generatred in this manner.
- Auto-generated only if there is no other inflected form (e.g. any verb or noun inflection).
- ===Adjective=== header of root term must be within an ==English== language section.
- VOTE:
- Comments:
- I would prefer that the headers of the created pages use ===Adjective form=== rather than simply "Adjective". This makes it clearer that mnore information will be found in a main entry. --EncycloPetey 23:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Don't like the word "form", but what about use as a noun, and doesn't -er have that too? Davilla 02:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)