Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-09/User:Interwicket, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Interwicket for bot status
- Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Interwicket for the following purposes:
- Interwiki bot. Uses code written for wiktionaries, not the interwiki.py code, rather than running it as Tbot or UllmannBot. Robert Ullmann 23:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 2 October 2007 23:59 UTC
- Vote started: 23:06, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion:
Support
Support Robert Ullmann 23:51, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Will be very useful to have its own identification.- Support, not because I really care which of your bots does this, but because I don't really care which of your bots does this. ;-) —RuakhTALK 01:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Connel MacKenzie 06:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC) Again: well done!
- Support \Mike 07:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support DAVilla 16:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC) except the name :-P
- I'm not that excited about the name either, although I am a cricket fan. (Wicketkeeper? T20? ;-). The important bit is to have some formal 'bot vote, since this is outside the scope of UllmannBot. If people are happy with, or prefer, it just running that way as it is now, that's fine, but we do need the vote. Robert Ullmann 22:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support Cynewulf 16:27, 27 September 2007 (UTC) No more sticky wickets
- Support Williamsayers79 07:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 00:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support ―Tohru 01:24, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
- Passes 9-0-0. DAVilla 06:20, 5 October 2007 (UTC)