Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Tbot for bot status
- Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Tbot for the following purposes:
- Update existing
{{t}}templates, changing t to t- or t+ as needed. - Add the t template to entries where useful.
- Documentation at User:Tbot
- Robert Ullmann 08:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Update existing
- Vote ends: 12 November 2007 23:59 UTC
- Vote started: 08:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion:
WT:GP- User talk:Tbot
- You may note Tbot creating some translation entries. This is experimental; all such entries are in Category:Tbot entries. This function is not part of the present vote. When I have something reasonable set up to look at, it can be discussed and then voted on separately. Robert Ullmann 01:26, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Support
Support —RuakhTALK 15:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)- Support Connel MacKenzie 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC) --Connel MacKenzie 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support Robert Ullmann 23:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support \Mike 18:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support — — 16:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC) yay
- Support Conrad.Irwin 23:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support DAVilla 03:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Yea!
- Support. bd2412 T 00:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 02:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC) For the record, I think it's a bad idea for a bot to create translational entries, even though this is not part of the present vote.
- It would be a bad idea for a bot to create entries that went unchecked; if they just appeared as "normal" entries some of the oddities might persist for a long time. (Some are quite amusing: Noun אסלה (aslá) f. 1. throne (lavatory or toilet) ... ;-). Creating entries that someone can then look at and expand is useful. It may depend largely on who is working on the language. Robert Ullmann 04:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support Rod (A. Smith) 01:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support Jyril 09:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support Cynewulf 18:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Even though it's already past the deadline.
Oppose
Abstain
Abstain —SaltmarshTalk 15:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC) I would be inclined to vote for this but since all implications of the vote might be over my head I will just abstain.
Decision
- Passes 9-0-1 with 3 late votes also in support. DAVilla 03:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)