Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-03/User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for bot status
- Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Opiaterein Inflectobot for the following purposes:
- Semi-automated addition of various inflected forms of Lithuanian nouns, adjectives, verbs, and (especially) participles. Test runs include the forms of smulkmena, šypsena, kūnas, skirtumas, kalbantis and kalbėsiantis. A few more examples of test runs can be found on the nominated user's talk page.
- — opiaterein — 20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Vote started: 20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Support
Support — opiaterein — 20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC) as nominator and bot-owner.- Support Conrad.Irwin 20:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 20:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support Nadando 20:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen 22:09, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support SemperBlotto 22:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support Razorflame 22:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Sure, why not? The user has demonstrated that his bot works appropriately. Cheers!
- Support Volants 16:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC) - the bot looks good. --Volants 16:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Vahagn Petrosyan 20:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Robert Ullmann 07:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC) "because I work fast and I'm not crazy about the idea of going back and fixing things that I've already done" operator is way too careless, explicitly stating that he will just plow ahead if issues are not resolved by others quickly. If this is permitted, someone will sooner or later have to correct all of this proposed bot's entries. An operator who states a priori that is unwilling to "fix things I've already done" is in direct violation of bot policy: "I will un-do any edits which consensus decides were unwanted." Ric: it is imperative, and required, that those things be sorted out first, that you yourself ensure that they are sorted (not hoping they'll be "nipped in the bud"), and that you are both willing and committed to running additional bot edits to correct any problems or make other needed changes. This is not negotiable. Robert Ullmann 07:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've been pretty careful to make sure all my preloads are fixed if any errors show up in them. Some of those errors have been pretty major, and I've handled them all quite well. I even deleted a whole batch of uploads to fix one stress pattern. So the issue of correcting problems isn't particularly... not valid, that's not the word I'm looking for. But it's somewhere around there. — opiaterein — 10:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- And the assertion that someone will have to fix all the bot's entries is greatly unappreciated, as the number of entries that you're referring to is incredibly small compared to all the entries the bot uploads. — opiaterein — 10:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Abstain
Decision
- Pass 9-1-0, can someone please make it so. Conrad.Irwin 15:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
- Made it so. SemperBlotto 21:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)