Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-09/User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Conrad.Bot to do anagrams

  • Nomination: I hereby request permission for User:Conrad.Bot to:
    Create templates containing anagrams (such as Template:anagrams:en/aabdor) and include them on pages just before the first category link ( abroad)
    The robot can be manually overridden using the simple protocol of {{include anagrams}} and {{exclude anagrams}} - the presence of which in the master template will cause it to include or exclude every parameter of each from the process.
    While initially it will only add the anagrams for English, I expect that, as with the indices, it will include other languages as the specific details behind what they count as an anagram are revealed.
    Conrad.Irwin 22:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59 20 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 22:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support EncycloPetey 22:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  3. Support I'd also like them horizontal, but that a separate decision as Cirwin made it all customizable. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 23:22, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
  4. support this will save us lots of tedious work which a bot can do in a much better fashion. -- Prince Kassad 17:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  5. Support, for reasons already stated above. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  6. Support Why not? :) 50 Xylophone Players talk 22:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  7. Support Manual work saved is a good thing. (Pretty soon, we're not gonna need editors anymore 'cuz people came up with bots for every task imaginable :) L☺g☺maniac chat? 16:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
  8. Support and hope to see more bots doing fully automatizable tasks such as creating categories like Category:hy:Anatomy or adding lang=hy parameter to context tags such as {{colloquial}} when I forget. --Vahagn Petrosyan 09:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
  9. Support —RuakhTALK 14:50, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose EncycloPetey 22:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC) I don't oppose the idea of anagrams or their inclusion as a section, but they should be listed after the Translations section, ahead of See also, External links, and References (or possibly after the See also). --EncycloPetey 22:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
    Ok, I was going by the list in WT:ELE which puts them right at the end. Conrad.Irwin 22:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
    The list there doesn't include them. --EncycloPetey 22:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Oh, I see; it's a level 3 header. --EncycloPetey 22:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision

Oh, I missed this one. Belated support! I had wished for an anabot for a while. Equinox ◑ 22:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia