Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-12/User:Darkicebot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Darkicebot for bot status
- Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for Darkicebot for the following purposes:
- fixigar and its form of entries with the purpose of making Ido verb form entries.
- Razorflame 21:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Vote started: 21:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
Oppose Equinox ◑ 21:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)- Oppose Prince Kassad 21:53, 2 December 2009 (UTC) bot owner is not yet able to handle a bot properly.
- Oppose Rising Sun 21:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC). I really think there was no need to have asked for the de-botting in the first place, but I'm not happy with RF asking again. It seems like a lot of wasted time on his part. I'd rather just create these forms myself, or have another bot account create them. I don't believe RF knows enough Ido to convince me to let him run his Ido bot. --Rising Sun 21:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Fine then. Go ahead and run your bot to add Ido verb forms. Razorflame 21:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Look, Razorflame, don't take this the wrong way, I don't want to discourage you from editting here. It's just that having a bot account is a reasonably big deal (maybe more so than adminship), because there's the ability to do a lot of damage, even if it is unintentional. And if one doesn't know the language which one is dealing with so well, it is probably best avoided. I understand that Ido is a very regular language, but the concerns we have are valid. I'm sending you an email to explain further. --Rising Sun 22:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not disheartened. It is obvious that I don't know the language well enough to run a bot for it, and I understand that bots have the potential to do more damage to the Wiktionary than a regular user, which is why I decided to withdraw from this vote instead of keep it going because I believe that I don't know the language well enough to run the bot. Cheers, Razorflame 22:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Look, Razorflame, don't take this the wrong way, I don't want to discourage you from editting here. It's just that having a bot account is a reasonably big deal (maybe more so than adminship), because there's the ability to do a lot of damage, even if it is unintentional. And if one doesn't know the language which one is dealing with so well, it is probably best avoided. I understand that Ido is a very regular language, but the concerns we have are valid. I'm sending you an email to explain further. --Rising Sun 22:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Fine then. Go ahead and run your bot to add Ido verb forms. Razorflame 21:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Abstain
Decision
- Owner withdrawn