Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3 you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-01/User:Darkicebot for bot status 3, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Darkicebot for bot status
- Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Darkicebot for the following purposes:
- As a back-up bot for Esperanto form-of entries, based upon evidence gathered on the first bot vote for User:Darkicebot. It will be adding pronunciations to its' entries as soon as I nail the coding down pat (which should only be a few days).
- For creation of Ido verb form-of entries based upon test edits listed at edits made this page. I've confirmed with a native speaker on the Ido Wiktionary that those all of the forms for Ido verbs are correct and that they are all there. Thank you!
- Razorflame 11:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- Vote started: 11:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Discussion:
User talk:Darkicebot, several talk page messages and BP messages
Support
Support Yair rand 00:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC) But PLEASE don't mess this up again! --Yair rand 00:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Do not worry. I won't mess it up again. Razorflame 00:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Neskaya contribs – talk? 09:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC) I see that you seem to be entirely unable of taking no for an answer, however I still have a word for you, and that word is no. Despite the obvious lack of consensus for the bot and the opposition towards it not including myself, you still seem intent on having the bot flag. I'd be much happier if I were to see this go several entire months untouched before you requested the flag again. A failed attempt does not mean post in the beer parlour then create yet another vote. --Neskaya contribs – talk? 09:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)- Not again! -- Prince Kassad 19:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Has failed 3 times already; please explain what has been done to address concerns and why this vote is different. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 06:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- He did pass the vote the first time, then requested that his own bot status be withdrawn. Y'know, just for historical accuracy. Mglovesfun (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Equinox ◑ 18:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose DCDuring TALK 03:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Abstain
Decision
Failed 1-5 --Rising Sun talk? 21:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)