Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-01/User:Mjbmrbot, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Mjbmrbot for bot status

  • Vote ends: 23:59 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 14:07, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Mglovesfun (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC). Based on its contributions, no errors. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  2. SupportInternoob (DiscCont) 00:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC) Why not?
  3. Support —Stephen (Talk) 14:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
  4. Support Malafaya 18:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC) - it's curious how randomly these votes can go. My vote above (MalafayaBot) got declined and I'm sure it was in no worse conditions to be approved than this one. Oh, well...

Oppose

  1. Oppose for the same reasons as Malafayabot. —RuakhTALK 21:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
    Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-12/User:MalafayaBot for operation in Article namespace (I assume Ruakh means), for anyone who wants to see.​—msh210 (talk) 22:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision