Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-02/User:Asturianbot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Asturianbot for bot status

  • Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:Asturianbot for the following purposes:
    Making entries for conjugated forms of Asturian verbs, for example lladraríes. Over the last year and more, we've been seeing a large improvement in the level of Asturian here on Wiktionary, with a handful of users helping out to create, check and improve entries. Previously, an Asturian bot has run on more than one occasion, but it was running illegally back then. The aim of this bot is to do the same thing, but legally and with a bot flag.
    Back on the list (talk) 18:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59 18 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 18:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose Last I heard, your bots made enough errors that they weren't trustworthy. If I'm assured that's changed, I'll change my vote. (I'd not vote at all, as I'd think more people would be voting in this section. Since no one has, though, I'm voting to prevent the possibility of something like a 2–0 passage.)​—msh210 (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  2. Oppose per msh210. --Dan Polansky (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  3. Oppose Gauss (talk) 22:29, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision