Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2014-12/User:Type56bot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Type56bot for bot status

  • Vote started: 00:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Discussion:
    where someone explained they were blocking me
    User talk:Type56op9 where I was told to slow down
    where people show their negative feelings about the bot.

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose --Dan Polansky (talk). Posting oppose to nominally have the vote running. If people post support, I can switch to abstain or even support. The nominator is a recent incarnation of User:Wonderfool, a noted mixture of a good editor and a troublemaker; I am not sure we want to grant bot flag to a user whose behavior shows occasional bouts of troublemaking. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
  2. Oppose I'd be more comfortable if the user would simply work inside the usual rate limits rather than have a bot flag-- bots can make a lot of trouble to clean up. --Neskaya sprecan? 16:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
  3. Oppose, still loads of Dawnraybot entries that need fixing years after it ran. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision