Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Versageek for checkuser
- Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Versageek as a local English Wiktionary CheckUser. DAVilla 11:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 19 September 2007 23:59 UTC
- Vote started: 19 August 2007
- Acceptance:
- I accept this nomination, thanks. --Versageek 12:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Additionally, Should I be chosen as a local CheckUser, I agree to abide by the WMF CheckUser policy as recorded on Meta. --Versageek 13:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Support
Support. Note that Versageek is a CheckUser on WikiHow, so is already familiar with these complex tools. DAVilla 12:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)- Support —Stephen 13:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Rod (A. Smith) 19:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 19:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support. bd2412 T 02:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support —Saltmarsh 06:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Connel MacKenzie 06:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Jeffqyzt 13:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support We need more checkusers, from what I've seen, and I'm sure Versageek would be a good person to have and use the tools. Neskaya talk 21:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support SemperBlotto 21:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- 'Support 'ArielGlenn 21:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Tohru 12:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support I'm wary of creating any new CheckUsers at all, but I'll support one as I think that at least, might have utility. None of the other candidates are untrustworthy, but I think Versageek is ideal, and has experience to boot. Dmcdevit·t 07:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support H. (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Williamsayers79 10:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Cometstyles 21:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Keene 11:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Aphaia 04:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Not personal but reviewing the log, English Wiktionary doesn't seem to need another checkuser. At least now. 50 checks were performed since August 1, 2007. I think three users enough to deal with them. And generally I think the number of checkuser granted users should be kept only as many as necessary.
