Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-08/User:Versageek for checkuser. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-08/User:Versageek for checkuser, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-08/User:Versageek for checkuser in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-08/User:Versageek for checkuser you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-08/User:Versageek for checkuser will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2008-08/User:Versageek for checkuser, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Vote ends: 15 September 2008 23:59 UTC
- Vote started: 16 August 2008 23:59 UTC
Support
- Support —Stephen 14:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support DCDuring TALK 14:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Rod (A. Smith) 15:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support RJFJR 16:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Bequw → ¢ • τ 16:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 18:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 18:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC) --EncycloPetey 18:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Thryduulf 19:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC) Thryduulf 19:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support DaveRoss 19:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Conrad.Irwin 19:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support TBC 22:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Good user. Cheers, Razorflame 00:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support DAVilla 05:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support Connel MacKenzie 21:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support At first I was a bit doubtful, since this editor is not one of the most active; but he's shown fairly steady levels of vandalism-fighting over the long term, and on reflection, I've decided it's probably a good thing to have at least one CheckUser who's less active on the high-volume
flamewar discussion pages. —RuakhTALK 21:41, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support A trusted admin SemperBlotto 21:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support no significant reason to oppose. Connell66 03:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Support per above. bd2412 T 00:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support Neskaya talk 07:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support H. (talk) 14:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC) Am I still on time? :-)
- Support Dan Polansky 19:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support EVula // talk // 20:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support --flyax 20:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support - Long-standing admiration for valuable contributor. - Amgine/talk 21:44, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support -- ArielGlenn 21:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support Wytukaze 21:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Panda10 22:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support \Mike 23:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support Nadando 01:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support Visviva 11:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
- Request has been posted on Meta :) --Versageek 05:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)