Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-04/Fictional languages, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Fictional languages

  • Voting on:
A fourth bullet will be added to WT:CFI#Constructed_languages stating:
  • "There is consensus that languages whose origin and use are restricted to one or more related literary works and its fans do not merit inclusion as entries or translations in the main namespace. They may merit lexicons in the Appendix namespace. These languages include Quenya, Sindarin, Klingon, and Orcish."
The mentioned languages will be removed from their current section, as well.

Support

  1. Support Dmcdevit 15:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support DAVilla 15:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  3. Support —RuakhTALK 16:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Support EncycloPetey 17:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support Atelaes 17:49, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Support Robert Ullmann 17:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC) you'll have to modify the second as well, so to continue to make it clear that all 23 constructed languages with iso codes are mentioned in one category or another
  7. Support Tim w. 18:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Support Connel MacKenzie 05:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC) In light of recent discourse, I give this option the strongest support imaginable.
  9. Support Saltmarsh 11:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support Widsith 10:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support SemperBlotto 10:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Phat support (but we get to keep Qapla', yes?). bd2412 T 20:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  13. Support Williamsayers79 21:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  14. Support Richardb 05:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Even this inclusionist draws the line somewhere.! (I don't think we will ever have any Klingon readers !)

Oppose

  1. Oppose H. (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Useless though it may be regarding the vast majority above, I’d like to have any word here. I want to learn Quenya some time, see. H. (talk) 21:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia