Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2007-08/Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank
- Voting on: The deletion of Wiktionary:Disambiguation in layout - Policy Think Tank, which is not a currently implemented policy, and the archiving of its discussion page.
- Vote ends: 11 September 2007 23:59 UTC
- Vote started: 23 August 2007 00:00 UTC
- Vote created: DAVilla 12:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Support
Support DAVilla 12:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)- Support —Stephen 12:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 14:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Connel MacKenzie 14:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Thryduulf 23:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Robert Ullmann 23:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC) why the F is this a vote? this is a policy-TT page that only says it is policy because of the redirect. Why not just delete it? even RFD/O would be excessive! Robert Ullmann 23:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Presumably, to underscore the point, that no one here appreciates being dragged through this sort of nonsense. Don't you remember the amount of BS the last time I RFDO'd one of these? --Connel MacKenzie 23:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- I wanted to ignore the banner that says "This...policy, guideline or common practices page...should not be modified without a VOTE." However, I saw a lot of other pages that include the Policy-TT template, such as Dispute resolution, Verifiability, About Latin, Quotations, and Usage notes, so I thought it unwise. But now looking at Dispute resolution it says "This policy...needs a lot of though and work before it can become...accepted policy but...it's a starting point." On Usage notes it says "Anyone should...feel free to build a Draft Policy in this page." Are those the sorts of things we have to bring to vote to modify? It seems a lot of these pages carry the banner erroneously. DAVilla 18:48, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you made the right call in going through the formal procedure on this one. My understanding is that a new policy has to be voted in, not simply have the banner stuck on it. --EncycloPetey 18:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not certain that a few pages didn't just have the policy tag stuck on them, like this one for instance. Maybe we could come up with a list that were never actually voted on, that really do need to be policies, and just vote on them collectively, to get that formality out of the way? DAVilla 20:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- "Just?" <ominous laughter> --Connel MacKenzie 04:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not certain that a few pages didn't just have the policy tag stuck on them, like this one for instance. Maybe we could come up with a list that were never actually voted on, that really do need to be policies, and just vote on them collectively, to get that formality out of the way? DAVilla 20:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- I think you made the right call in going through the formal procedure on this one. My understanding is that a new policy has to be voted in, not simply have the banner stuck on it. --EncycloPetey 18:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Support Jeffqyzt 13:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC) The discussion on the page didn't seem to go anywhere...
- Support Cynewulf 22:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Speedy Support
- Support Williamsayers79 10:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
- Passes 9-0-0. DAVilla 16:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)