Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-08/Wiktionary:About sign languages, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Wiktionary:About sign languages
- Voting on: Adoption of Wiktionary:About sign languages as policy (as of this version). This relaxes WT:CFI for these rarely written languages. It also establishes a system for transcribing signs for entry naming purposes.
- Vote ends:
811 October 2008 23:59 UTC - Vote started:
811 September 2008 23:59 UTC
- Vote created: Rod (A. Smith) 03:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- Amendment in progress per feedback from Davilla, EP, and Robert.... Rod (A. Smith) 15:42, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion:
Wiktionary:Beer parlour archive/2007/August#sign languages, revisited- Wiktionary:Information desk/Archive 2007/July-December#American Sign Language
- Wiktionary talk:Criteria for inclusion#Sign languages?
- Wiktionary:Grease pit#Help with sign language templates
- Wiktionary:Beer parlour#Wiktionary:About sign languages
- Wiktionary talk:About sign languages
Support
Support Rod (A. Smith) 01:39, 11 September 2008 (UTC)- Support EncycloPetey 16:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support —RuakhTALK 23:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support for now. Not every problem can be foreseen. DAVilla 05:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support H. (talk) 14:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC) For now, indeed. Changes will have to be made, but it’s a very good start. I’d rather see pictures in translation tables, though.
- Support per DAVilla and H. A lot of kudos to Rod for his work on this!—msh210℠ 21:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- Indeed! —RuakhTALK 01:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support Conrad.Irwin 22:29, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support Neskaya kanetsv 16:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support From what I can tell it's on solid ground. Go for it! --Bequw → ¢ • τ 07:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
AbstainHow does this distinguish sign language from common hand gestures? Also wouldn't it be wise to include at least one citation of use? I don't know much about languages for the deaf, but I could give you an example of a cultural sign that's stated incorrectly in Lonely Planet, and likely any publication that borrows from that. DAVilla 01:24, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Decision
- Passes 9-0-0. Rod (A. Smith) 01:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)