Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-01/Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Allow "Prepositional phrase" as a POS header

  • Voting on: adding the header "Prepositional phrase" to the table at ], with the category "(language) prepositional phrases", and without any notes.
    Note: it is my (Ruakh's) intent that this header be used in English entries, as well as other-language entries, but this vote will not modify any policy to state that explicitly.
    Note: some languages might decide, after further discussion, to use this header for inflected prepositions as well, in which case the category will likely be "(language) preposition forms" instead, but this vote will not specify that, and it is not my (Ruakh's) opinion that any vote will be necessary for that.
    Note: neither "Adposition" nor "Postposition" is a standard POS header, so I (Ruakh) see no need to consider "Adpositional phrase" and "Postpositional phrase" at this time.

Support

  1. Support —RuakhTALK 16:12, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support, no question that it accurately reflects usage in identifying these parts of speech. bd2412 T 18:02, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.​—msh210℠ 02:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support Razorflame 22:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
  5. Support. of course -- ALGRIF talk 18:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support DCDuring TALK 15:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose DAVilla 07:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC) I think we should be going the other direction, taking headers like ===Abbreviation== out and replacing them with the part of speech that applies.

Abstain

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia