Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-02/Correct figures in CFI, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Correct figures in CFI

At present another 13 of the 2600 languages in the ISO 639-3 list are constructed languages. Words in 10 of those languages have not yet been approved for inclusion in the English Wiktionary.

  • Change the figure 2600 to 7000. An IP originally added this figure, and it is unknown where it comes from. By current count, the ISO 639-3 standard contains about 7,500 languages (which can be verified by downloading the ISO 639-3 SQL dump), so this figure should be changed.
  • Change the figure 13 to 12 and the following figure 10 to 9. Since this paragraph lists only nine languages and the next paragraph contains three (for a total of twelve languages), the count should be updated to reflect that fact.
  • Vote starts: 00:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Yair rand 00:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support. Also, for this kind of non-policy change that's highly unlikely to be controversial, I think it's fine to set the vote to last just a week. (SFAIK, we don't have any policies on how long a vote has to be run for.) —RuakhTALK 03:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support Bequw → τ 05:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support Well, It's only logical to do so isn't it? 50 Xylophone Players talk 14:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  5. Support I don't understand why such trivial changes should be voted at all. Not that Wiktionary concept of language is identical to ISO 639-3 but anyways. --Ivan Štambuk 14:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
    Re: voting at all: I agree, but see Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes. Your nemesis had a hand in that. ;-)   —RuakhTALK 16:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support. On whether to have a vote: It seems good that we have CFI tightly under control; a vote for a highly uncontroversial change can be made last only one week. --Dan Polansky 17:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
  7. Support Equinox ◑ 17:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC) Ha. Equinox ◑ 17:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia