Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

CFI amendment

Notwithstanding any other rules and regulations, the term MissingNo. is not permitted at the English Wiktionary.

  • Vote starts: 00:01, 10 December 3456 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23.59, 8 January 3456 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Equinox 22:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC) Reluctantly. I don't think this vote is the right way to approach the problem, but I haven't seen any other better approach, and I agree with the general thrust of it. I can't take it very seriously though. Equinox 22:17, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose Daniel. 20:07, 10 December 2010 (UTC) The creator of "Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment" did not provide any reason for the deletion of that entry. If any word complies with all rules and regulations, then I would expect it to be kept. A hypothetycal policy that excludes MissingNo. presumably would be based on recognizable characteristics of what is to be avoided on Wiktionary. In my experience, criteria for exclusion (ex.: "sum-of-parts", "inflection of deleted entry", etc.) are expected to apply to multiple words, not just one. If MissingNo. should be deleted according to an existing policy or one introduced in the future, then naturally words in similar circumstances such as the alternative spelling Missingno would be deleted as well. --Daniel. 20:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
  2. Oppose Clearly, it's a joke, but I don't understand the objective. I would propose another admendment instead: removing mentions of fictional universes from CFI. Lmaltier 20:17, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
  3. Oppose, essentially per Daniel. Adding ad hoc rules is not the way. What's that saying about the history of an organization's being readable by examining its bylaws?​—msh210 (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
  4. Speedy delete. DAVilla 22:05, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
  5. Oppose adding "Notwithstanding any other rules and regulations, the term MissingNo. is not permitted at the English Wiktionary" to CFI. --Dan Polansky 22:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Abstain

  1. Abstain — Beobach 20:22, 10 December 2010 (UTC) I abstain until we draft a serious proposal. (Make suggestions on the talk page!)

Decision

Deleted early, in 14 December 2010. I'm closing this as unfinished, anyway. --Daniel 17:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)