Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Removing outdated ELE category text. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Removing outdated ELE category text, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Removing outdated ELE category text in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Removing outdated ELE category text you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Removing outdated ELE category text will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Removing outdated ELE category text, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Removing outdated ELE category text
The list of entries on a category page will be alphabetized in the strict Unicode order of the titles unless you dictate otherwise. One effect of this is that all English entries beginning with a capital letter will be listed before any that begins with a lower case letter. You can change how an item is sorted with a piped link. By placing ] in the entry drug will force that term to be at the top of the list since Unicode lists the asterisk before any letter. Words that define a category name should be “piped” in this way. Similarly, putting ] in the entry Aspirin will force it to be alphabetized among words that begin with a lowercase letter.
In most cases the category name should begin with a capital letter. This takes advantage of Unicode sorting to create separate lists for each foreign language that is represented within the broader set of categories. Foreign-language categories can begin with the language code in lower case. |
Rationale:
- The instructions about "]" directly contradict the result of Wiktionary:Votes/2011-04/Representative entries.
- The alphabetization in categories is case-insensitive nowadays.
- Vote starts: 00:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC) (in 4 days)
- Vote ends: 23.59, 2 April 2012 (UTC) (duration: 7 days)
Support
- Support --Daniel 06:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support Liliana • 06:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 23:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC) That explains a lot...
- Support Dan Polansky (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Note for the record that I do not like how this vote was announced in the BP. We have (IINM) a requirement that votes be announced there, and the announcement for this one was tacked on to the end of a section that had not seen an edit in more than a week at that time. It should IMO have been a new section. I have now announced it properly IMO. I will not stand on ceremony and extend this vote therefore, but certainly will not blame anyone who wishes to. I would do so myself if this vote were of more consequence or more controversial.—msh210℠ (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support —RuakhTALK 21:16, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC) Though, I think this, like a number of other such votes, shouldn't be necessary. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 21:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -flyax (talk) 22:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support - -sche (discuss) 01:43, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Mglovesfun (talk) 11:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
10-0-0 (100%) - Passes --Daniel 23:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)