Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Voting on: Adding a rule to WT:NORM:

  • No spaces between a linked term and the opening or closing brackets, or between a linked term and the pipe. (], not ])

Schedule:

  • Vote starts: 00:00, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Discussion:

Support

  1. Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  2. Support, obvious measure. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:49, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  3. Support -Xbony2 (talk) 12:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  4. Support --WikiTiki89 15:37, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
  5. Support -- Andrew Sheedy (talk) 06:45, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
  6. SupportVorziblix (talk) 06:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
    Support, since the spaces aren't visible when not in edit mode, and they can cause confusion to new editors who might think those spaces will be visible (and part of the link), they shouldn't be allowed TheWombatGuru (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
    Not an eligible voter. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 16:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
  7. Support — I thought this was already covered by WT:NORM. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 13:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
  8. Support - but I would support allowing (or even encouraging) a space between the namespace and the entry, like ]. --Dixtosa (talk) 10:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
  9. Support: It's kind of trivial, low value-added change since I have not seen this "norm" violated, but I support it anyway. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
  10. Support — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 23:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
  11. SupportJohnC5 02:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
  12. Support --Vahag (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

  1. Abstain I don't see why anyone would even want to put them, so I assume when someone does, it'll have its reasons. Korn (talk) 09:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Decision