Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Trivia

Voting on: Removing a few words from WT:EL#Anagrams and other trivia:

Other sections with other trivia and observations may be added, either under the heading “Trivia” or some other suitably explanatory heading.

The final result should be:

Other observations may be added, under the heading “Trivia”.

Rationale:

  • Disencouraging the creation of new, undiscussed trivia headings. Suppose someone wants to add in the entry: "'Foo' is the only word in the language X that has 'oo' in it." Regardless of the merits of that information, arguably it should be kept in the "Trivia" section, not in a new section called "Vowel count", "Orthographical properties" or any other name.
  • Minor edit: Shortening the text. Using less words to say "Other sections with other trivia and observations".

Schedule:

  • Vote starts: 00:00, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion:

Support

  1. Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  2. SupportΜετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  3. Support I don't think we should be permitting arbitrary headings in general. Could complicate any future transition to a more semantic/database-type format. Equinox 02:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  4. Support. Ultimately I'd even get rid of the Trivia sections. - -sche (discuss) 03:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  5. Support as a step forward, even if not the best ultimate outcome. --WikiTiki89 16:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
  6. Support — I.S.M.E.T.A. 01:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
  7. Support embryomystic (talk) 04:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  8. Support -Xbony2 (talk) 01:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
  9. Support. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 06:16, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose "Other observations" is too vague. This, that and the other (talk) 01:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
    What do you think would be an improvement? -Xbony2 (talk) 17:42, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision