Rector 09:32, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) Please vote on what you think about this: For: Just the sort we need. SemperBlotto 11:52, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) Thanks, that's...
Farmbrough 22:37, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC) For: Trusted sysop on Wikipedia, why not? Being a sysop is not a privilege. 24 21:06, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) Against: --Wonderfool...
13:04, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) - No reason to object; seems to be a serious contributor --Polyglot 13:34, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC) --Kevin Rector 03:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)...
12 Jun 2005 (UTC) Of course, she not only cares for the project but is a great recruiter. Against: -- Appointed. Eclecticology 04:10, 2005 Jun 13 (UTC)...
December 04 and is in the top 50 in terms of edits. Ncik 20 May 2005 <Jun-Dai 18:38, 23 May 2005 (UTC)> I'd be honored. </Jun-Dai> Please vote on what...
December 2005 (UTC) Cute seeing votes against him...does this mean the vandals are scared of him? --Connel MacKenzie T C 03:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC) That's...
year. Eclecticology 04:42, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) I concur. (assuming this is a vote of some description...) - TheDaveRoss 05:12, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) This certainly...
from Wiktionary:Administrators. I started editing Wiktionary on 26 March 2005 and have edited 370 times. As I see too many uncategorized pages, I am categorizing...
contributions since 2005. As a long-time member of the community, this user can be trusted with the admin tools. DAVilla 16:43, 17 August 2007 (UTC) Vote ends: 31...
I've used advanced user rights elsewhere; I've been on this project since 2005 and have become much more active since 2013 or so. If anyone has concerns...