Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2006-01/User:Dangherous

Discussion moved from Wiktionary:Administrators.

Although Dangherous has been here for a very short time, and his definitions have been few, he has shown an interest in the administrative side of this Wiki. However, I'm sure he would understand if you think he needs to get bedded in first. SemperBlotto 12:32, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

I accept my nomination. --Dangherous 19:47, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• For:
  1. Jon Harald Søby 16:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  2. Redesigned the Community portal and countless other pages. Gerard Foley 01:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
  3. Doing a great job, so far! — Dvortygirl 06:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
  4. Seems good to me. —Stephen 16:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
  5. Had a good vandal-chasing yesterday. — Vildricianus 10:03, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  6. All the same Kipmaster 17:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
  7. Tohru 05:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
  8. --Connel MacKenzie T C 18:51, 6 February 2006 (UTC) It seems he would use admin tools well, especially with Main Page experiments. He has demonstrated a willingness to listen to the community in matters of this nature.
  9. Since I nominated him, I had better vote for him. SemperBlotto 16:17, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
  10. Seems to be a doing a very good job. Keep up the good work! --Dijan 23:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  11. --Jusjih 04:21, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Against:
  1. Changing this vote for an "against". He's been vandalising on Wikipedia. Well, moreso shouting at people and pissing them off. --ex-admin part-time sockpuppetting quasi-vandal Wonderfool 00:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Evidence? — Vildricianus 11:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

He's kidding about vandalism. --Dangherous 17:21, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comments

Hmm, I figured I'd get back and the tools would be bestowed upon me. Alas, they're not. --Dangherous 18:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Decision: Patience is a virtue. :-) Accepted Eclecticology 01:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)