Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-04/User:Ruakh for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
  1. Babel: en, fr-3, es-2, he-2
  2. Timezone: U.S. Mountain Time
  3. E-mail link: verified.
  4. RuakhTALK 04:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC). Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support Atelaes 04:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I trust Ruakh with the buttons more than I trust myself. It's about time.
  3. Support Robert Ullmann 12:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  4. Support. bd2412 T 15:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support Widsith 15:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  6. Support DAVilla 17:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support Tohru 21:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
  8. Support Lmaltier 12:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  9. Support —Stephen 13:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support Williamsayers79 13:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support Cynewulf 14:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support Beobach972 15:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC) (— Beobach972 15:46, 28 April 2007 (UTC))
  13. Support --Keene 17:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

  1. Abstain Connel MacKenzie 21:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC) I dislike the tendency of treating Wiktionary as if it were Wikipedia, or the assumption that it is driven by Wikipedian concepts. I think a few months from now might be better.
    If you could give me some specifics (whether here, or on my talk-page, or via e-mail), I'd appreciate it. I don't know what you're referring to, and whether or not I'm given adminship, I'd like to know if I'm treating Wiktionary like something it isn't. Thanks in advance. —RuakhTALK 22:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Decision