Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-07/User:Thryduulf for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Thryduulf

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Thryduulf as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Thryduulf has been an administrator on Wikipedia for two years and on Commons for a year and a half. Although he has not been involved with Wiktionary very long, he is a valuable contributor. This user is aware of what he doesn't know fully and can be trusted to act in the role of an admin. If he is still finding his way around, then so am I. DAVilla 11:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 12 July 2007 5 August 2007
  • Vote started: 5 July 2007

Support

  1. Support DAVilla 11:56, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support —RuakhTALK 18:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Support --Keene 18:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  4. Support Connel MacKenzie 20:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  5. Support EncycloPetey 21:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC) (changing vote in light of the appropriate voting time frame)
  6. Support —Stephen 20:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  7. Support Atelaes 22:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC) I have yet to meet a Wiktionarian who isn't still finding their way around.
    That's a very good point. And welcome back. :-) —RuakhTALK 23:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
  8. Support — Beobach972 00:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC) (— Beobach972 00:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC))
  9. Support Widsith 09:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
  10. Support bd2412 T 04:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  11. Support Williamsayers79 08:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
  12. Support H. (talk) 09:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC) but e-mail has to be provided and verified first.
    I have sorted this now - I provided and verified my email when I accepted the nomination. I hadn't spotted that I'd not ticked the box to allow others to send me email. Thryduulf 18:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  13. Support Rod (A. Smith) 20:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
  14. Support --Tohru 12:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
  15. Support Robert Ullmann 20:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
  16. Support Jusjih 16:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
  18. Support † Raifʻhār Doremítzwr 01:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  19. Support ArielGlenn 04:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

  1. Abstain EncycloPetey 17:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC) On principle; a week for this vote is too short a time. --EncycloPetey 17:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
    What is the correct timeframe for such votes? I need to know so that the templates can be updated. I gave bot votes 12 days by the way, which is kind of arbitrary. DAVilla 18:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
    Of course they are arbitrary, but a 30 day vote is right in the preload of the sysop-vote init. That is comparable to previous sysop votes and quite reasonable. One week is definitely too short. --Connel MacKenzie 20:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
    Oh, I see; you just made that clarification yourself. Some previous votes have been longer than 30 days, others shorter. I can't see any reasonable argument with 30 days (but two weeks might also have been reasonable.) --Connel MacKenzie 20:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
    Further discussion at User talk:DAVilla#Template:vote-sysop. DAVilla 01:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia