Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2007-10/User:RJFJR for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RJFJR for admin
- Nomination: I hereby nominate RJFJR (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He's been around here for a while now, made a lot of good contributions, and contributed in an upbeat and helpful fashion to a lot of discussions. —RuakhTALK 03:30, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 3 November 2007 23:59 UTC
- Vote started: 20 October 2007 23:59 UTC
- Acceptance:
- Languages: en
- Timezone: UTC-5 (UTC-4 during Daylight savings)
- I accept (with appropriate humility, I hope) RJFJR 13:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Support
Support (Conditional on formal acceptance, addition of Babel templates to user-page, etc.) —RuakhTALK 03:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)- Don't be ridiculous, he's been an admin for years. What? He hasn't? Support! (upon acceptance of nomination, of course). bd2412 T 04:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support DAVilla 04:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Any palindrome who can welcome himself has my vote.
- Support Connel MacKenzie 05:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC) He's not already? Wow. I too, thought he's been a sysop (here) forever. --Connel MacKenzie 05:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Dvortygirl 05:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Obviously! And what do you mean we have to wait for acceptance?
- We must have a guideline somewhere that suggests waiting for acceptance (and for the vote to start!) I guess we're not too good at following silly rules, sometimes. (I hope I didn't just violate a guideline that I wrote!) --Connel MacKenzie 22:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Cynewulf 16:09, 19 October 2007 (UTC) Whaddya mean he's not an admin?! We must correct this grave oversight immediately!
- Support Williamsayers79 11:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Tohru 13:57, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen 16:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Widsith 16:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Neskaya talk 17:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Jyril 18:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 01:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Robert Ullmann 14:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Medellia 11:15, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support — Beobach972 03:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support H. (talk) 18:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Jeffqyzt 16:34, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support Rod (A. Smith) 19:15, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Support —SaltmarshTalk 08:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support Jonathan Webley 18:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- Support —Celestianpower háblame 20:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
- With 21 votes in favor and none opposed or abstaining, this vote passes; adminship will be granted as soon as we flag down a bureaucrat. —RuakhTALK 02:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Now made sysop. SemperBlotto 08:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)