Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-01/User:16@r for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:16@r for admin

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate User:16@r as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He's been very useful with Wikipedia links, etymologies, Latin and French terms and cross-project linking, and has been useful with adding tonnes of templates to various pages. Despite the initial concern about the @ in his username, he's proved a willing contributor. Keene 17:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 21 January 2008 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 7 January 2008 23:59 UTC
  • Acceptance:

Support

  1. Support Keene 17:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
    In addition to my above reasons for nominating, I'd like to point out that 16@r is the best user of edit summaries on the whole site, IMHO. They're always concise and correspond perfectly to the edit, showing his thoroughness. --Keene 17:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Support Widsith 14:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Too much cleanup generated - needs better understanding of formats here. Also, still using grandfathered username; definitely the wrong example to set for newbies. --Connel MacKenzie 21:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Abstain

  1. Abstain. Previously this editor would often ignore questions, comments, concerns, etc. on his/her talk-page, or give a vaguely dismissive response. I'd actually vote "Oppose", except that I don't know whether (s)he still does this, and I don't think past misbehavior should permanently disqualify an editor. —RuakhTALK 19:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
  2. Abstain Neskaya talk 07:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia