Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Teh Rote for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Teh Rote for admin
- Nomination: I hereby nominate myself as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. I've been a solid contributor and have learned a lot about Wiktionary practice, written and unwritten. Teh Rote 23:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 23:59 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- Vote started: 00:00 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Acceptance: Since this is a self-nomination, I think I'll accept.
- Languages: en, es2
- Timezone: UTC - 5
- Email confirmed
Support
Support Conrad.Irwin 23:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Would use the tools correctly. I have slight reservations about attitude, but hey - we're here to build a dictionary.- Support for the same reason as here. But if you are WF, and this vote passes, could you maybe try to be a better admin this time around? :-P —RuakhTALK 22:08, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Seeing as I don't exactly know who "WF" is, that'll be hard, but I could try. Teh Rote 15:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- According to Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2008-12/User:Equinox_for_admin#Discussion this is a user called Wonderfool and when I tipped User:Wonderfool I came across a page which was deleted twice by its own owner. Facetious, isn't it? Perchance it is interdicted to delete one's own page, so do not do it and I shall also cast my vote. Bogorm 16:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Seeing as I don't exactly know who "WF" is, that'll be hard, but I could try. Teh Rote 15:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Bogorm 16:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose Παρατηρητής 15:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC) (self-nominated)
- Can you clarify your comment? Are you opposing just because this is a self-nomination? If yes, I believe the policies page permits self-nomination. "Anyone with a fair track record of contributions can apply for administrator status." Wiktionary:Policies_and_guidelines --AZard 14:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose pending vetting by a CheckUser. (I've got a feeling. My apologies if I'm wrong.) —RuakhTALK 15:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. Teh Rote is a great contributor who has learned a lot about Wiktionary practice, written and unwritten. Can't comment on what constitutes a "solid" contributor, but he's certainly more active than myself. Neither do I doubt his intentions. Certainly any and all contributors who have a positive impact are welcomed as part of the community. However, that isn't sufficient justification for adminship, and I don't yet see any reason why he should be trusted to this role. I'm not saying that any qualities are lacking, just that the evidence is insufficient when it should be overwhelming. The nomination is premature. DAVilla 10:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Premature, per DAVilla. --Neskaya kanetsv 22:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain \Mike 23:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Normally I would simply pass a vote like this without bothering to edit, but... even I have seen that things have happened around this user, but I have no idea about how it came to happen, so I cannot make any fair judgment in either direction. Hence the explicit "abstain".
