Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-06/User:Ortonmc for desysop, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Ortonmc for desysop
- Proposal: I hereby propose Ortonmc be desysoped without prejudice. His last edit was 24 April 2007 (and no deleted edits are later, though I can't speak for oversighted ones). Our past discussions (for other sysops) have decided on a one-year-no-edits rule for desysoping, with quick reinstatement on return. The desysoping is to prevent havoc in case of access to the account by someone not the sysop, and does not reflect lack of faith in the actual user by the community. Moreover, Ortonmc's last edit (again, not including any possible oversighted edits) was agreeing to be desysoped. (Based on that agreement, I would have just taken this straight to m:SRP, but a steward told me we should have this vote first.)—msh210℠ 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Other history: Jusjih started this discussion before, but it went nowhere and was archived.
- Vote starts: 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Support desysoping
Support as proposer.—msh210℠ 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)- Support DCDuring TALK 18:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support SemperBlotto 18:51, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support. --Duncan 22:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Bequw → ¢ • τ 22:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support —RuakhTALK 23:46, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 02:20, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen 03:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Equinox ◑ 09:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC) A no-brainer, since he requested it himself!
- Support due to the administrator’s uncoerced consent to the change. † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 11:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support per his own statement to that effect. bd2412 T 01:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support 50 Xylophone Players talk 20:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Neskaya kanetsv 21:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC) After all, if he ever wants it back I'm sure that he'd have no trouble passing a vote. --Neskaya kanetsv 21:42, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ortonmc has been a sysop already, and this desysop is without prejudice. The only reason I see for discussion before resysoping is to ensure that user really is Ortonmc and not someone who's gained access to his account. (The latter is unlikely anyway, and) I'm not sure that that would require a vote. (No harm in having one, though (unless by that point in time we've "progressed" to WP-style admin votes, in which case avoidance of one will be a good idea).) But we can cross that bridge if and when.—msh210℠ 17:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support –blurpeace ( t / c ) 05:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Although I am new here and not sure my vote will count, I do not believe that Ortonmc would be a positive for the project with the sysop bit if he hasn't edited in over 2 years. Shappy 20:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Diuturno 07:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Oppose desysoping
Abstain
Decision
- The community has agreed to desysop Ortonmc without prejudice. I will bring this to m:SRP.—msh210℠ 15:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- This has been effected.—msh210℠ 16:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)