Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-07/User:Brett for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Brett for admin
- Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Brett as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He has been around for some years (formerly User:BrettR), is a bureaucrat on simple.wikt, and (I'm trusting the user page here) has some linguistic qualifications. Equinox ◑ 23:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- Vote starts: 00:00, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Acceptance: I accept, thank you.--Brett 01:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Languages: en, ja-2, fr-1
- Timezone: UTC-4:00
Support
Support Equinox ◑ 23:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)- Support DCDuring TALK 00:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support --RuakhTALK 15:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support Ivan Štambuk 15:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC) The more academicians around here, the better. --Ivan Štambuk 15:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Stephen 17:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support.--msh210℠ 18:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support Ƿidsiþ 07:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support Dan Polansky 09:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support Lmaltier 09:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Usually, I prefer not to participate to votes, but I'll make an exception. Lmaltier 09:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 19:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support L☺g☺maniac chat? 22:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC) Yikes, almost missed this! :) L☺g☺maniac chat? 22:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Abstain Neskaya kanetsv? 01:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC) --Neskaya kanetsv? 01:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Would you be willing to explain why? (Not that you have to, of course, but since abstentions don't really have any procedural effect, it seems like their primary use is as a place for comments?) --RuakhTALK 01:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Honestly, I just haven't had enough interaction with this user to be able to support the nomination. I haven't had negative interactions to oppose it, but. (And if it hadn't been when I was about to go to bed when I typed in the vote, I probably would have explained the first time.) --Neskaya kanetsv? 23:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Would you be willing to explain why? (Not that you have to, of course, but since abstentions don't really have any procedural effect, it seems like their primary use is as a place for comments?) --RuakhTALK 01:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain No evidence of this user ever fighting vandalism on this wiki. SemperBlotto 13:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- abstain I haven't had any personal experience with this user. -- Prince Kassad 14:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Decision
- Passed 11–0.—msh210℠ 18:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Made it so. SemperBlotto 07:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)