Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-02/User:Andrew massyn for desysop, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Andrew massyn for desysop
- Proposal: I hereby propose Andrew massyn be desysoped without prejudice. His last edit was 5 May 2007 (and no deleted edits are later, though I can't speak for oversighted ones). Our past discussions (for other sysops) have decided on a one-year-no-edits rule for desysoping, with quick reinstatement on return. The desysoping is to prevent havoc in case of access to the account by someone not the sysop, and does not reflect lack of faith in the actual user by the community. —RuakhTALK 13:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. I e-mailed him yesterday to let him know about the vote. He hasn't replied; if he does, I'll comment back here. —RuakhTALK 01:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- P.P.S. He replied. He said that he has no objections. (I think it would technically be a GFDL violation for me to copy his e-mail and paste it on-wiki, so if anyone wants to see it, send me your e-mail address and I'll forward it to you.) —RuakhTALK 16:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. I e-mailed him yesterday to let him know about the vote. He hasn't replied; if he does, I'll comment back here. —RuakhTALK 01:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Vote starts: 00:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Support desysoping
Support —RuakhTALK 01:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)- Support —Internoob (Disc.•Cont.) 01:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support.—msh210℠ 16:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Mglovesfun (talk) 16:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Ƿidsiþ 16:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC) Fair enough.
- Support SemperBlotto 16:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 03:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 03:27, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Anatoli 00:03, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Dan Polansky 13:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Razorflame 18:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose desysoping
Abstain
Decision
11-0-0. Passes. I've sent a steward request on meta --Rising Sun talk? contributions 12:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- done Removing from the list --Rising Sun talk? contributions 12:48, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Uh, why the steward request? You could have just asked one of the 'crats. --Yair rand 23:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Meh, job done all the same - I thought 'crats can't desysop. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 23:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- 'Crats here are able to as of a few months ago. Razorflame 17:24, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- Meh, job done all the same - I thought 'crats can't desysop. --Rising Sun talk? contributions 23:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- Uh, why the steward request? You could have just asked one of the 'crats. --Yair rand 23:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)