Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:EivindJ for de-sysop, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:EivindJ for de-sysop

User inactive since 2013. User:EivindJ is the userpage

  • Vote starts: 15 May 2015
  • Vote ends: 15 June 2015

Support removing sysop rights

  1. Support as nom. --Type56op9 (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
  2. Support SemperBlotto (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
  3. Support. There’re wide periods of inactivity between their returns. --Romanophile (talk) 20:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
  4. Support   — Saltmarshσυζήτηση-talk 10:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
  5. Support -- I attempted to contact this editor a several weeks ago on their talk page and by e-mail, and got no response. An admin should be reachable when circumstances necessitate. bd2412 T 01:17, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Oppose removing sysop rights

  1. Oppose per Dan Polansky. I know he voted Abstain, but his reasons are good enough for me to oppose. --Daniel 06:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Abstain removing sysop rights

  1. Abstain The magic keyword {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} gives 105 admins. There is no risk that removing admin rights creates unhealthy concentration of power. Last edit was on 23 April 2013 but there are only 4 edits in 2013, the previous other edit being from 28 March 2011, from which 4 years passed. Okay with me. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Decision

Passes 4–1. We need a b'rat.​—msh210 (talk) 04:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Done. —Stephen (Talk) 06:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)