Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-06/User:DerekWinters for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:DerekWinters for admin
- Nomination: I hereby nominate DerekWinters (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He's pretty decent, I guess. Type56op9 (talk) 09:53, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
- Vote ends: 23:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Acceptance: I accept. DerekWinters (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Languages: en, gu-3, hi-3, es-3, ur-2
- Timezone: UTC-5
Support
Oppose
Oppose not because I think he'd be an abusive admin, but because he's still something of a newbie and is not ready for a position of authority. Especially problematic is that he has added entries in languages that he does not mark himself as being proficient in and which do not seem to be citable per the CFI, and when I mentioned this to him, did not even respond to my queries. Admins have to know the rules inside out so that they can enforce them and instruct newbies, but DW has a ways to go. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)- Oppose per Metaknowledge; unattested created terms are a problem. Can be elected in future when there are no recent cases of such terms. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Abstain
Abstain - He could very well be a useful addition, but I never support such a nomination if it comes from WF. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Decision
- Failed. Not even the nominator supported the user. But that was down to scatter-brainedness more than anything else. --Type56op9 (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)