Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2018-01/User:Koavf for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Koavf for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate Koavf (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Friendly, polite and experienced contributor; I believe he'll put the admin tools to good use.
See User_talk:Koavf#Adminship for previous discussion.
Schedule:
Acceptance:
- Languages: en-N, es-2, de-1, pt-1 (and 1 on other Romance languages)
- Timezone: UTC+ 4
- Thanks to Rerum for the nomination. @Equinox, PseudoSkull: who commented on my talk regarding this. Also @AryamanA, Daniel_Carrero, Donnanz who may have opinions on this topic pro- or con- and @Metaknowledge, DTLHS, wikitiki89, xbony2, Andrew Sheedy, Victar, Robbie SWE, Mahagaja, Vahagn Petrosyan since they voted on me before for another issue. I would encourage everyone to take a look at this unsuccessful CheckUser vote and the recent discussion of de-sysopping 19 admins for context, and this cross-activity tool or Special:CentralAuth/Koavf to get an idea of what I do around the WMF projects and how I've used advanced user rights elsewhere; I've been on this project since 2005 and have become much more active since 2013 or so. If anyone has concerns, questions, etc. I'll be happy to address them. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Support
- Support -Xbony2 (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support We did have a serious clash a while ago, but since then we have been able to co-operate. So I'm prepared to give Justin a chance, he would probably be a better admin than I ever would (I have no ambitions). DonnanZ (talk) 16:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support, you had me at "ping" :-) --Robbie SWE (talk) 19:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support I know this user to be extremely nice and happy and positive. Also, Koavf is a very trustworthy editor both here and on other projects, and has been here a long time. He really knows his way around and knows what he's doing, and clearly enjoys to do what he does. PseudoSkull (talk) 18:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support I have encountered Koavf across several Wikimedia projects and though we have had disagreements, his manner is polite and respectful. Green Giant (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Tom 144 (𒄩𒇻𒅗𒀸) 00:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support I had oppositions to Koavf being a bureaucrat, but I think he'd be a great admin. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 15:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support – Jberkel 15:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support Equinox ◑ 22:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support = TheDaveRoss 13:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 21:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 09:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support — Ungoliant (falai) 01:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Support
←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 13:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
Passes 15–0. Could a bureaucrat amend my user rights, please? Thanks to whomever does and everyone for the vote of confidence. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
- Done. Add your name to WT:Admins, please. —Stephen (Talk) 00:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)