Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:About Khanty. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:About Khanty, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:About Khanty in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:About Khanty you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:About Khanty will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:About Khanty, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
These have /ɬ/, which is however written ӆ and not ԓ (this is instead, I believe, /ɭ/). Quite a few current entries are sourced from a dictionary (Kononova 2002) which uses a rather ԓ-like but regardless clearly el-with-tail glyph. --Tropylium (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
(Listed here in case anyone wants to argue that ԓ for /ɬ/ is actually a competing dialectal standard that should have precedence. --Tropylium (talk))
I would say just go ahead and move them yourself. Unless there's a chance that other languages will have terms using the original spellings, the redirects that you leave will actually be useful for those who make the same mistake when searching. Given the similarity of the characters, I have a hunch scannos from online books might be a major source of these. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Update: apparently the normative glyph is in fact ԯ (el with descender). However, this has not been widely available in fonts, so ӆ or ԓ have been used as workaround solutions in some materials. (Can anyone reading this actually see the first glyph?) --Tropylium (talk) 09:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
They do, though we never did settle here if we should move them to use ԯ or ӆ. Since the latter is attestable as well, and seems to render better, I would be okay with it (even if we might be setting ourselves up for replacing these again with alternate-spelling soft-redirects some years down the line). --Tropylium (talk) 01:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
If ԯ is the canonical glyph, that's the one we should use. If non-canonical glyphs are widely used, we can use hard or soft redirects for them. —Mahāgaja · talk21:52, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Looks fine to me. To be sure Thadh is right too about ԓ being also in use for /ɬ/; but some of this is probably eventually best resolved by splitting the Khanty main dialect groups as separate languages — the Volkova & Solovar dictionary is not Kazym Khanty as the entries here are, but Surgut Khanty, whose orthography differs also in some other conventions (e.g. for 'ear' and 'seven', not пӑԓ, ԓапӑт but пәԓ, ԓапəт. --Tropylium (talk) 16:59, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
