would that have to be moved? --LA2 07:45, 6 September <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) Why do you interpret this <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> as confining statistical information to the proposed Statistics...
08:44, 17 September <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) Would this be like a normal <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> (i. e. 66% support is needed to pass), or like an admin re-election <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> like Wikipedia does...
suggestion for a similar wording or <span class="searchmatch">vote</span>? --Daniel. 22:52, 22 September <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) I don't understand what the <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> means, either. Are we requiring that...
Mglovesfun (talk) 21:28, 21 September <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) Beats me - and I've read the blurb. SemperBlotto 21:34, 21 September <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) Essentially, it is a simple...
of <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> need to be revoked. Is there anyone disagreeing? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:19, 19 May <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) I disagree with striking <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> that...
would be determined using the preference <span class="searchmatch">votes</span>. --Dan Polansky <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:39, 6 September <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) In Approval <span class="searchmatch">voting</span>, you can approve of any subset of the candidates...
I'd <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> for such an option, but I do think it's a legitimate option to have.) —RuakhTALK 23:52, 31 January <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) From how I understand the <span class="searchmatch">vote</span>, the...
December <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) Although this is a policy <span class="searchmatch">vote</span>, or maybe a meta-policy <span class="searchmatch">vote</span>, there is no actual text to enter CFI. For the purpose of this <span class="searchmatch">vote</span>, consider...
as this: Votes/pl-2006-12/Change style standard to use new trans-top style templates <span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/pl-2006-12/PIE ... --Dan Polansky <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:56, 3 April <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC)...
--Bequw → τ 20:22, 13 March <span class="searchmatch">2010</span> (UTC) We have seen even stranger <span class="searchmatch">votes</span>...:-) Sorry, wrong word, I meant that the two <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> could have been on the same...