—RuakhTALK 19:46, 27 July 2011 (UTC) Please indicate whether you think this proposal has any effect on the outcome of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-12/Treatment...
for one or two lines each. Equinox ◑ 14:33, 2 July 2011 (UTC) Well... For starters, if this vote passes and an entry only needs either a "See also" or...
no longer being added to Unicode. —RuakhTALK 18:07, 6 July 2011 (UTC) I suggest restricting this vote to entries written in Latin script only, regardless...
I may well change my vote to "oppose" (though not yet. I still want to hear arguments either way).—msh210℠ 14:37, 10 August 2011 (UTC) Good thing I listed...
02:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC) I've created Wiktionary:Votes/2011-04/Derivations categories as a separate vote. --Yair rand 05:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC) I don't...
languages Category:French terms derived from Spanish --Daniel. 07:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC) The vote as currently worded is very unclear to me. I don't know what...
be the decision.—msh210℠ (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2011 (UTC) Formally speaking, I do no think that votes for option 1 and option 2 can really be added. But...
20:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC) I'm listing this on the main votes page so it gets more notice, but not setting a start-date for the vote yet. - -sche (discuss)...
about recording the words as they are actually printed.--Prosfilaes 07:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC) Many printed sources don't use ƕ, but sources that don't use...
create a vote. If this vote fails, that is okay, even though I would like it to succeed. I do not understand why some people are so scared of votes that fail...