Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Votes/2014-08/Templates context and label, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Is this for real?

Polansky, you are approaching self-parody. Keφr 17:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

So tell us, sir, to which template should we convert Wiktionary to? Do you already know it? --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Implicit label supporters

I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of {{label}}:

  • Aɴɢʀ: diff - 23 August 2014
  • Cloudcuckoolander: taxocrat - 22 October 2014‎
  • Embryomystic: diff - 5 October 2014
  • ‎Hekaheka: fenomenologisesti‎ - 28 October 2014‎
  • Kephir: wojak - 25 October 2014‎
  • ReidAA: diff - 5 October 2014
  • Tweenk: partacz - 10 January 2015

--Dan Polansky (talk) 08:43, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 23:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:04, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Implicit lb supporters

I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of {{lb}}:

  • Aɴɢʀ: diff - 17 October 2014
  • Chuck Entz: jacopever - 11 January 2015
  • I'm so meta even this acronym: rosewooden - 30 November 2014‎
  • JohnC5: Mugel - 11 January 2015‎
  • Keith the Koala: hither and yon - 12 January 2015
  • -sche: diff - 7 October 2014
  • Saltmarsh: ροή - 5 December 2014‎
  • Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV: genótipo - 9 January 2015‎
  • Vahagn Petrosyan: diff - 16 January 2015

--Dan Polansky (talk) 07:46, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:20, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:11, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:31, 16 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:28, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Implicit cx supporters

I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of {{cx}}:

  • ‎Atitarev: diff - 27 October 2014
  • Equinox: plutey - 24 October 2014‎
  • Matthias Buchmeier: Macker - 11 January 2015
  • Romanophile: YouPube - 8 November 2014
  • Type56op9: diff - 17 November 2014
  • Widsith: : ‎knick off - 29 October 2014‎
  • Wyang: bể - 11 January 2015‎

--Dan Polansky (talk) 07:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Implicit context supporters

I have detected the following implicit supporters of the use of {{context}}:

--Dan Polansky (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Updated. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:13, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above statistics are not completely relevant to the vote

I use {{lb}}, but I use it because it's both a shortcut and because of the parameter order. If {{cx}} had the same parameter order, I'd use that too. So just the use of a particular doesn't imply that someone prefers that name. —CodeCat 00:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

The actual editing behavior in the mainspace is merely an ersatz, but it is better than nothing in the absence of explicit disclosure of editor preferences. If e.g. editors use "cx" rather than "lb", it may be because they prefer "context" over "label", or because they prefer "lang=en" over "en", or because they are unaware of "lb". Ideally, editors should disclose their preferences explicitly. They may do so in the poll, but they may also do so on this talk page. --Dan Polansky (talk) 00:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)Reply