Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-12/Adding RFEs to all lemma entries where etymology is missing. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-12/Adding RFEs to all lemma entries where etymology is missing, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-12/Adding RFEs to all lemma entries where etymology is missing in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-12/Adding RFEs to all lemma entries where etymology is missing you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-12/Adding RFEs to all lemma entries where etymology is missing will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary talk:Votes/2014-12/Adding RFEs to all lemma entries where etymology is missing, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Allegedly, the RFEs make people more likely to add the missing etymologies. More of a rationale needs to be provided by supporters of the proposal. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
Am I eligible to vote on this even though I am not an administrator? Kaixinguo (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
- @User:Kaixinguo: Yes, you are eligible. Being an admin is nowhere close to being a prerequisite; I am not an admin. The eligibility criteria are at Wiktionary:Votes/header, in "Voting policy" collapsed section. You are especially welcome by me as contributor of real substance as per Special:Contributions/Kaixinguo. --Dan Polansky (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply