parameter. --Daniel Carrero (talk) <span class="searchmatch">01</span>:46, 6 February <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) Done --Daniel Carrero (talk) <span class="searchmatch">01</span>:48, 6 February <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) I see. In that case, the question...
Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/pl-2012-12/Removing phrasebook, Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/2014-08/Templates context and label. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 20:14, 18 January <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC)...
February 2016 (UTC) Seems to be the case. Wyang (talk) <span class="searchmatch">01</span>:53, 2 February <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) As the <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> creator, I only edited the presentation of what was already...
I've posted a notice of this <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> to Uncle G's talkpage, but he has no e-mail set up.—msh210℠ (talk) 22:59, 11 January <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) My mailbox was confirmed...
withdrawing the <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> that are clearly going to fail, but only 1 does seem to fit: Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/pl-<span class="searchmatch">2016</span>-<span class="searchmatch">01</span>/Pronunciation Other <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> either look like...
falsely imply that the exceptions are somewhat common. --WikiTiki89 21:<span class="searchmatch">01</span>, 5 February <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) What about "unless otherwise stated"? Also, it follows from...
addition of unpopulated translation tables. DCDuring TALK 23:20, 10 February <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) Mass addition of unpopulated translation tables would have at least...
comment/vote either on Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/pl-<span class="searchmatch">2016</span>-<span class="searchmatch">01</span>/Pronunciation or the respective talk page. I hope I didn't miss anyone. This new <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> is scheduled to start in...
<span class="searchmatch">vote</span>, since it has the larger ratio and that ratio meets the 2/3rds requirement, unless you're counting <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> supporting one (current) logo as <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> opposing...
<span class="searchmatch">votes</span> to end before using the table again. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 06:11, 30 August <span class="searchmatch">2016</span> (UTC) @Andrew Sheedy: One <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> ended, so there are 13 <span class="searchmatch">votes</span> now...