adminship votes. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC) @Metaknowledge: better? --Romanophile ♞ (contributions) 04:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)...
I created Wiktionary:Votes/2016-05/New logo 2 to find out. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC) Normally when a vote fails we don't immediately...
November 2016 (UTC) @Dan Polansky: Sorry, should this vote go on? I withdrew this because in Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2016/November#Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-11/One...
In Wiktionary:Votes/2016-04/New logo, three logos were proposed. Their support-oppose results were as follows: Current: 14:19:4 - 42% Book: 22:17:3 -...
withdrawing the votes that are clearly going to fail, but only 1 does seem to fit: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation Other votes either look like...
maybe we should create votes to nominate new template editors? --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC) The vote states that it would be...
to suddenly come back, like during this vote, and deletes this page? lol Philmonte101 (talk) 04:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC) He'd probably get in trouble for...
References ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2006-12/form-of style ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2010-08/Italicizing use-with-mention ^ Wiktionary:Votes/2016-09/Definitions — non-lemma...
votes to end before using the table again. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 06:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC) @Andrew Sheedy: One vote ended, so there are 13 votes now...
August 2016 (UTC) Good point about adding images. I removed the text you quoted from the vote's "rationale and notes". --Daniel Carrero (talk) 16:04, 24...